don't read the menu options and go directly to the page content 
Ed Miliband \"Immigration is top of Labour’s agenda\"So we REALLY are going to fight the election on UKIP's agenda http://t.co/yrVoPSgB4m
24 Oct 2014

The Poor in Venezuela saw Chavez's Victory As Their Own

You are here: Home / News / Articles / The Poor in Venezuela saw Chavez's Victory As Their Own

08 Oct 2012
Afew hours ago I was in the Venezuelan election centre in Caracas witnessing the
room erupt into relief and delight at the official announcement that Hugo
Chavez had won a fourth term. And the noise in the room was nothing compared to
the pandemonium we could hear outside. Fireworks were being let off, cars and
motorcycles were racing up and down with their horns blaring and even apartment
dwellers used pots and pans to beat out victory on their window sills and metal
grilles.

The relief was partly because a delayed result had meant hours of suspense. In
Venezuela you have to let everyone who is queuing to vote cast their vote, even
after the polls have officially closed. We election monitors had witnessed the
unprecedented lines of people queuing patiently to cast their vote. This big
turn-out meant many polling stations stayed open hours later than the
advertised closing time and consequently delayed the announcement.

But, in the information vacuum, rumours were swirling around the city of Caracas
that Chavez had in fact lost and this increased the tension. Nerves were also
on edge because, although Chavez was used to facing a lavishly funded opponent
with tacit support from the US, his opponents this time were united and the new
opposition leader Henrique Capriles was young and dynamic. And Chavez himself
had wrestled with cancer for over a year.

The election was not just a big event for Venezuela. It was a vital election for
Latin America and the Caribbean. Chavez was the beginning of a wave of
democratically elected centre-left leaders in Latin America including Lula in
Brazil, Evo Morales in Bolivia and Argentina's Christina Fernandez.He has also
helped the region in practical ways making oil available to cash strapped
Caribbean countries on favourable terms (including the United States' bête
noire Cuba). A defeat for Chavez would have been a disaster for the centre-left
in the region and a victory for US neo-conservatives.

So the Venezuelan Electoral Commission flooded the country with independent
election monitors like myself, to make sure that the election process was
not just free and fair but seen to be so.

If Chavez won again they wanted no excuse for a repeat of the 2002 Bush inspired coup. In fact, in a day touring polling stations, I observed that their state-of-the-art  voting system is
far less susceptible to fraud and impersonation than the system in Britain.
There are no postal votes, no proxy votes, you identify yourself with
fingerprints and the electronic process offers you a receipt for your vote so
that you know that it has been recorded properly and not got lost in the
system.

The ballot papers also feature a full colour photograph of every
candidate so there is no question of voting for the wrong candidate by mistake.
It is worth considering that, if such a system had been in operation in the
2000 Florida presidential election, Gore might have won Florida and recent
American political history might have been very different. And far from
opposition media being suppressed, virtually every leading paper supported
Chavez' opponent. Along with other election observers, I spoke to
representatives of the opposition party at every polling station we visited.
They agreed the system was indeed free and fair.

Western critics of Chavez often forget his substantial achievements for the poor of
Venezuela. Deaths in childbirth have gone down from 20in a 1000 to 13 in a
1000. Unemployment has gone down from 14.5% to 7.6% and the number of
Venezuelans in extreme poverty has dropped from 23.4% to 8.5%.

It is those numbers and the big improvements in the life-chances of the poor that
explain the undying loyalty of ordinary Venezuelans to Chavez. He is also
non-white in a country which, although racially diverse, has traditionally been
run by European elites. Poor Venezuelans identify passionately with Chavez.

The Chavez regime has its problems; including crime, corruption and the unremitting
hostility of the United States. Perhaps the biggest problem is the health of
Chavez himself. If his cancer were to return, there is no succession plan.

But last night in the balmy Venezuelan night air, as the city of Caracas erupted
with joy around us, there could be no doubt that the poor of Venezuela saw a
victory for Chavez as a victory for themselves.

This article was first published in the Huffington Post in 8th October 2012

back
website by Hudson Berkley Reinhart Ltd